wow, staying with focus, instead of entertaining the myriad directions that can continually branch off, is a supra mental significance. Like earlier posts, it seems impossible to write about, since to capture the multitude and speed of examples that are the experience of "distraction" is impossible. just one eg, then: that i was researching temptation, but the recall of Jesus doodling enticed(?) me. i was wondering about going with the moment to choose doodling as the title versus wondering about staying with temptation, as a practice of focus. ergo the two as title in honor of not being tempted by duality! and that is the focus here!
how do "writers" manage to tether the multiverse to one linear channel? i don't even mean manage since the linear could never manage to extract itself from the plethora, but how do they feel the possibility, sense an importance, derive the satisfaction from producing one, much less not be distracted by the multiple lines (of temptation). since only one line can pop up at a time (however quickly) it seems maybe not a temptation of the attraction of the other lines, but maybe the temptation then of distraction, and maybe the "nature of temptation" itself? ( that was the blend phrase i wanted to research - focus on! - and started with about an hour ago!).
i just remembered taking my antibiotic (after occurring to sip some liquid!). the instantaneous (almost!) decision to follow through versus consider it a distraction ("i can keep focus and take the pill more appropriately on completing this). just saying ... !
so, doodling. isn't it all doodling? i TRUST. i am TRUST trusting its trusted. does one focus when doodling? that doodle has a linear manifestation as much as anything. of course in duality we choose the different experiences of staying focused, a livelihood, a vision versus doodling, meditation, letting go. even that choice seems weird because how would we consciously determine (deter mine ?!) which to pursue when or when to pursue which (how could one know even whether to start with which or when? !).
oh the doodling of focus! but yet the seeming importance of focus (even though focus seems to have led me to take the not so far fetched leap of faith that there is only doodle). however, not to discount i'm still on one yin or yang of duality. the Great Doodle/Focus is likely no more accurate than the Great Focus/Doodle. are their doodlers that eventually discover focus?
good thing i took that pill when i did! but i feel like "I" "kept" a coherence here. i guess just as well put: i kept a "coherence". i am going to reread this right now!
oh, and the sub-time of this. the experiences and choices that this writing,refers can seem to be happening way fast, in seconds or even partial seconds, but since focus or doodle can't be chosen conciously, in a way choices are being made even faster. to entertain this consciously maybe is the mental trying to dance with the supra mental. and now i'll say i'm tired of dancing and am "going to sit down". in the name of Trust, the trusted (Mike)
